The information on this page supports the Institutional Review Board (IRB) protocol for using materials provided by the academic institution for a research project. This page will supply essential elements such as the rationale for using these materials, obtaining informed consent from participants, ensuring confidentiality and privacy, securing and storing the data, conducting a risk assessment, analyzing and reporting the data, addressing ethical considerations, and outlining the qualifications of the researchers. By following this information, the research project aims to adhere to ethical guidelines, protect participant rights, and contribute valuable insights to the field while utilizing the materials provided.
IRB Protocol Materials
Articles
Topics
Conducting Research with Trauma Survivors
| Distress in Response To and Perceived Usefulness of Trauma Research Interviews Carlson, E. B., Newman, E., Daniels, J. W., Armstrong, J., Roth, D., & Loewenstein, R. Publication Date: 2003 Publication Title: Journal of Trauma & Dissociation, 4(2), 131–142 DOI: 10.1300/J229v04n02_08 Topic: Conducting Research with Trauma Survivors Reference: Carlson, E. B., Newman, E., Daniels, J. W., Armstrong, J., Roth, D., & Loewenstein, R. (2003). Distress in response to and perceived usefulness of trauma research interviews. Journal of Trauma & Dissociation, 4(2), 131–142. doi:10.1300/J229v04n02_08 Ethics of Asking Trauma-related Questions and Exposing Participants to Arousal-inducing Stimuli Carter-Visscher, R. M., Naugle, A. E., Bell, K. M., & Suvak, M. K. Publication Date: 2007 Publication Title: Journal of Trauma & Dissociation DOI: 10.1300/J229v08n03_03 Topic: Conducting Research with Trauma Survivors Reference: Carter-Visscher, R. M., Naugle, A. E., Bell, K. M., & Suvak, M. K. (2007). Ethics of asking trauma-related questions and exposing participants to arousal-inducing stimuli. Journal of Trauma & Dissociation, 8(3), 27–55. doi:10.1300/J229v08n03_03 Research Ethics in Victimization Studies: Widening the Lens Cromer, L. D., & Newman, E. Publication Date: 2011 Publication Title: Violence Against Women DOI: 10.1177/1077801211436365 Topic: Conducting Research with Trauma Survivors Reference: Cromer, L. D., & Newman, E. (2011). Research ethics in victimization studies: Widening the lens. Violence Against Women, 17, 1536–1548. doi:10.1177/1077801211436365 Ethical Issues in Trauma-related Research: A Review Newman, E., Risch, E., & Kassam-Adams, N. Publication Date: 2006 Publication Title: Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics DOI: 10.1525/jer.2006.1.3.29 Topic: Conducting Research with Trauma Survivors Reference: Newman, E., Risch, E., & Kassam-Adams, N. (2006). Ethical issues in trauma-related research: A review. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 1(3), 29–46. doi:10.1525/jer.2006.1.3.29 The Risks and Benefits of Participating in Trauma-focused Research Studies Newman, E., & Kaloupek, D. G. Publication Date: 2004 Publication Title: Journal of Traumatic Stress DOI: 10.1023/B:JOTS.0000048951.02568.3 Topic: Conducting Research with Trauma Survivors Reference: Newman, E., & Kaloupek, D. G. (2004). The risks and benefits of participating in trauma-focused research studies. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 17, 383–394. doi:10.1023/B:JOTS.0000048951.02568.3 Overview of research Addressing Ethical Dimensions of Participation in Traumatic Stress Studies: Autonomy and Beneficence Newman, E., & Kaloupek, D. G Publication Date: 2009 Publication Title: Journal of Traumatic Stress DOI: 10.1002/jts.20465 Topic: Conducting Research with Trauma Survivors Reference: Newman, E., & Kaloupek, D. G. (2009). Overview of research addressing ethical dimensions of participation in traumatic stress studies: Autonomy and beneficence. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 22, 595–602. doi:10.1002/jts.20465 |
Consent with Patients with Severe Mental Illness
| Challenges and Considerations for Obtaining Informed Consent | |
| Ryan Ochoa | |
| Publication Date: | |
| Publication Title: Dissertation | |
| DOI: | |
| Topic: Consent with Patients with Severe Mental Illness |
Ethical Codes
| Ethical Principles of Psychologists and Code of Conduct | |
| APA | |
| Publication Date: | |
| The Belmont Report: Ethical Principles and Guidelines for the Protection of Human Subjects of Research | |
| U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | |
| Publication Date: | |
| Federal Policy for the Protection of Human Subjects (“Common Rule”) | |
| U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | |
| Publication Date: | |
| Public Welfare: Protection of Human Subjects | |
| U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | |
| Publication Date: 2009 | |
| Code of Ethics | |
| American Counseling Association | |
| Publication Date: 2014 | |
Snowball Sampling
| Snowball Sampling: Using Social Networks to Research Non-heterosexual Women | |
| Browne, K. | |
| Publication Date: 2005 | |
| Publication Title: International Journal Social Research Methodology | |
| DOI: 10.1080/1364557032000081663 | |
| Topic: Snowball Sampling | |
| Browne, K. (2005). Snowball sampling: Using social networks to research non-heterosexual women. International Journal Social Research Methodology, 8, 47–60. doi:10.1080/1364557032000081663 | |
| Comment: On the Concept of Snowball Sampling | |
| Handcock, M. S., & Gile, K. J. | |
| Publication Date: 2011 | |
| Publication Title: Sociological Methodology | |
| DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9531.2011.01243.x | |
| Topic: Snowball Sampling | |
| Handcock, M. S., & Gile, K. J. (2011). Comment: On the concept of snowball sampling. Sociological Methodology, 41, 367–371. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9531.2011.01243.x | |